The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the defendant did not assault the victim at the time of the appeal, the court below found him guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts.

2. Determination

A. On October 28, 2016, the Defendant used the part of the Defendant’s hand arms at one time, and used the part of the Defendant’s hand arms at one time in the direction that, on the ground that, around 10:45 on October 28, 2016, tobacco smoke from the Defendant’s dwelling was entered into the house of the victim D (n, 33 years old) residing in the upper part of the Defendant’s dwelling area, which was located in the Defendant’s dwelling area, and that, in the course of the Defendant’s dwelling, the Defendant committed assaulted the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant could not close the door.

B. The following circumstances are acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the first instance court, namely, the victim D found the Defendant who resides in the lower instance at the time.

배를 피우지 말아 달라고 부탁하였는데, 피고인이 현관문을 닫으려고 하기에 문을 잡고 있던 중 피고인이 손으로 자신의 팔을 때리고 발로 오른 발목 부위를 찼다’ 고 진술하고 있는 점( 증거기록 제 10 쪽), 피고 인도 수사기관에서 ‘ 현관 문을 닫으려고 여자의 팔을 밀치고 발을 밀었다’ 고 진술하였고( 증거기록 제 18 쪽), 원심 법정에서는 이 사건 공소사실을 모두 인정하였던 점( 공판기록 제 27 쪽) 등에 비추어 보면, 피고인이 당시 피해자에게 폭행을 가한 사실을 넉넉히 인정할 수 있으므로, 원심의 판단은 정당한 것으로 수긍이 되고, 거기에 피고인의 주장과 같은 사실 오인의 위법이 없다.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.