The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: although the victim B continued to get the floor of the living room due to PT Byung and fighting with the victim, there was no assault with the victim by taking the victim's face and part of the body, and there was no assault. Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court: ① the victim stated in the investigative agency and the court of the lower court specifically and consistently on the background and content of the assault by the Defendant, the subsequent circumstances (Evidence No. 7, 8 pages, 36, 37 pages of the trial record); ② the victim at the time reported “the Defendant was at the time,” and the police officer called the victim, and the victim was sent to the G hospital on January 19, 2016, and the Defendant appeared to have received treatment, such as slin, slin, slinal, slinal, slinal, and slinal, slinal, and slind, slind, slind, slind, slind, slind, slind, slind, slind, slind, slind, 36).

Therefore, the defendant-appellant.