The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment determined in consideration of the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the fact that there is a record of punishment for the same crime, the fact that the investigative agency actively cooperates in the investigation of the narcotics offender, the purchase and administration of phiphonephones, the fact that the nature of the crime was not less than easy by the purchase and administration of phiphones, and the fact that the phiphone was a response to the training of phiphones as a result of the maternity appraisal, it cannot be said that the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.