logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2020.11.11 2019나2934
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Plaintiff), the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant Co., Ltd.).

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court on the basic facts and the Defendant’s main safety defense and this part of the judgment is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited including summary language pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of this court on the assertion and judgment on this part of the main claim is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

7 The 7th parallel " has rejected or rejected the implementation thereof," shall be made in the manner that "the implementation has been delayed or rejected."

7 The term "in the case of land 4" in one parallel shall be changed to "in the case of land 7".

8. Five parallels of 8 pages, “(i) are written as the representative of Plaintiff A under the above certification document, but “(i) is written as “E, the representative of the State A,” but is written as “E, the representative of the State A,” in one letter of the above certification document.”

8 The 8th Hair Hair Hair Hair Hair Hair Hair, " was in a state of resignation and was in a state of resignation."

The 9th two parallels "At present, prosecuted and pending trial by this Court No. 2018 High Court No. 2465, the defendant was prosecuted by Cheongju District Court No. 2018 High Court No. 2465, and some of the facts constituting the crime were found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment for six months, and the defendant is currently serving a trial by Cheongju District Court No. 2020No120."

9-7 parallels "Nos. 16, 17, 23, 24, 26, 52, and 67" have been written with "No. 2, 17, 52".

The 9th 3 to 8th 2th 2th 2th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 2

③ On the part of the seller, the plaintiffs transferred N, P, T, approximately 300 of approximately 200,000 shares to the defendant, the 100,000,000 interest payment terms of KRW 142,00,000,00, "M Union obligations repayment terms," "A, B C ownership transfer," "3,00,00," and "3,000,00 shares of approximately 18% of the co-owned area" and "1,400,00."

arrow