1. The plaintiffs confirm that they are the defendant's assistant status.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a clan that is composed of descendants from the 15-year old descendants as a joint ancestor, and the plaintiffs are the members of the Domason's clan.

나. 원고들의 선조인 D 및 그 후손은 1924년 편찬된 B 대동보인 갑자보(甲子譜)와 1964년 편찬한 E세보인 갑진파보(甲辰派譜)에 C의 7세손이자 F의 자(子)로 각 기재되어 있다가 1997년 편찬된 E파보에는 F의 계자(系子)로 기재되어 있다.

C. According to the above satisfaction table, G-H-I-J-K-F-D is described in sequence by descendants of C.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-3, 4, Eul evidence 1-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. 1) The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The plaintiffs are descendants of D, who are 7 years of age of C, as descendants of D, and they are the defendant's members. 2) In light of the following circumstances in light of the defendant's argument, D cannot be acknowledged as the defendant's descendants, and the plaintiffs who are descendants of D are not the defendant's members. A) The plaintiffs are not indicated as D's descendants in D's family registry book published before the Gap Jin Pin Pin Pin Pin Pin Pin Pinc, because D is not stated in D's family registry book, and it seems that the members of D were not residing in the Ldong where the defendant members were gathered, and considering the circumstances where D's descendants were scar in the defendant's land at the time of publication of Gap's family registry, it appears that the plaintiffs' descendants of D's members purchased the status of descendants of D's members and M, which are their siblings, as the members of the defendant's family registry, the defendant's descendants did not recognize them as the members of D's general meeting after December 15, 198.

C) Recognizing that D was changed to F’s leader on July 14, 2007 from the Emphical Emph compiled in 1997 and N, the latter grandchild of D, the Defendant’s extraordinary general meeting, D, was not the latter grandchild of D, and that D’s latter grandchildren, the former grandchild of D, the Defendant’s group, were not the Defendant’s members, and exercised their entirety rights on the Defendant’s cemetery or property.