1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing this case, is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following portions, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

[Attachment] The second 15 to the second 19 parallels of 19 parallels as follows:

C. The Defendant was receiving medical treatment by asserting that the instant accident occurred “brupt and human salt ties and tensions of wooden parts, salt tensions and tensions of the brushell, and branes, etc.” The Plaintiff paid approximately KRW 34,305,330 to the hospital that the Defendant received medical treatment by using payment guarantee for medical expenses.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Gap evidence Nos. 12, and Eul evidence Nos. 30,496,490 won, "34,30 won" of 34,305,330 won, which is about 4,305, and 30,496,490 won, which are about 34,305,30 won, and 30,490 won among them, which are about 2 weeks after the accident of this case, shall be returned from November 25, 2013 to 3,80,808,840 won, the following day after the delivery of the written amendment of the claim and the cause of claim No. 1183, Jun. 9, 2014.

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance that accepted the plaintiff's claim is just, but the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial is accepted in addition, it is decided to revise the judgment of the court of first instance as above and it is so decided as per Disposition.