1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 7,673,220 and KRW 673,220 among them.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows. Thus, the reasoning of this court's explanation is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following cases, and it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420

The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: 7,00,000 won (the age and occupation of the plaintiff, the background of the accident of this case, the degree and degree of the plaintiff's injury, the treatment progress, and all other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case).

C. From June 8, 2017, which is the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case sought by the Plaintiff after the date of tort with respect to the Plaintiff’s KRW 7,673,220 (affirmative damages KRW 673,220,000) and KRW 673,220 among them, the Defendant is obligated to dispute over the existence or scope of the Defendant’s obligation to pay damages for delay calculated annually from June 8, 2017, which is the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case sought by the Plaintiff from June 7, 2017 until December 7, 2017, which is the day when the judgment of the first instance is rendered, with respect to KRW 5,700,000, which is the day following the delivery date of the copy of the complaint of this case sought by the Plaintiff after the date of tort, to June 8, 2017, which is the day following the delivery date of the complaint of this case.

A person shall be appointed.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as they are without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is partially unfair, and thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is to be modified as above.