The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The defendant alleged that M is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts and unfair sentencing, but the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty in light of the defendant's economic condition and health status, although the victim and H's investigative agency and court of the court below stated that the defendant expressed that "the defendant expressed his desire to make a emerculation in the court of the court of the court of the court of the court of the court," and the above statements can be sufficiently recognized according to the evidence duly adopted and examined in the court of the court of the court below. (The defendant is the police officer's request for an audit of the victim's public funds at the Korea Until June 2008 branch D branch of the court of the court of the court of the court of the court below, but the defendant's request for an audit of the victim's public funds at the time of the defendant's embezzlement, the defendant's statement at the time of the court of the court of the court below and the court of the court of the court below's judgment that the defendant expressed his desire to do so.)