The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

Around 20:10 on January 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed an act of assaulting the victim E (the aged 62) who observed that the victim E (the aged 62) had been in dispute with the above D owner on the street in front of the Seo-gu Busan, Busan as a parking problem; (b) “I will do so to a large number of people,” and (c) “I must do so,” and “I must do so,” and “I must do so.” The charges of assaulting the victim on the ground that I wish to do so, such as “I am flick,” and “I see that I am flick and do so in the process of exercising the Defendant’s right of defense ex officio.” However, the witness E tried to have ex officio made a statement to the effect that “I am flick and do not suffer any substantial disadvantage in the process of exercising the Defendant’s right of defense.”

In addition, the defendant's use of violence, the occurrence of the result of injury, and the causal relationship is recognized, and the attitude of the assault is only recognized differently, and it does not be judged not to be acquitted separately.

The victim's injury was caused by tearing the number of treatment days so that it can not be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. A criminal investigation report (general);

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (Consideration of punishment for a victim, exemption from punishment, and minor points of injury);