beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the legal marital relationship between the victim C (male, 31 years of age) and the married couple on March 27, 2008.
On August 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30, Jeju-si, D Apartment 205 205 dong 205 dong 205; (b) requested that the Defendant brought about a fluorial food in his relative house and brought about the food to another relative by the victim; (c) the victim was unable to bring about it on the ground that he was bad; (d) the victim was in a dispute with the victim; (e) laid the fluor, which contains a drinking water, was laid on the floor; and (e) the victim was fluened by having the victim fluened with the fluor who was seated by the victim; and (e) assaulted the victim by having the victim go beyond the next place.
Summary of Evidence
1. The legal statement of the witness C;
1. Statement to C by the police;
1. As above, C’s statement is made as evidence that conforms to the facts charged in the accusation book and recording book.
C stated in the complaint that “the defendant was seated by the witness and threatened him.” The police protocol stated that “the witness was sicked by force, and then left behind the witness as it later,” and stated in the police protocol that “the witness was later left behind.” The prosecutor’s investigation was conducted that “I am above this, and the witness was also seated, so I am above the witness, and the witness was sick up to him. I am above the witness. I am again before this court testimony that “The defendant tried to sick down, but the witness was not sicked, so the witness was not sick.” The witness and the witness were not sicked to do so.” The testimony was made in this court testimony that “The defendant tried to do so.” The same is that the witness and the witness were not sicked.”
C Each of the above statements mentioned above is not completely identical to the contents, but the defendant will take one of the above statements on the premise that C was standing and was seated.