logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.08.12 2015고단1744
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 1744"

1. After committing the joint crime between the Defendant and D, the Defendant promised to raise a living cost through the Internet goods fraud, and posted a false advertisement on August 9, 2015, stating that “the Defendant shall sell c.50,000 won by accessing the Internet opening site from the mutual influenite in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu around August 9, 2015,” and falsely stating that “the Defendant would deliver 350,000 won to the victim E who reported it,” and that the Defendant was remitted from the victim to the account (F) in the name of the Defendant around August 10, 2015.

In addition, the Defendant, together with D, obtained a total of KRW 750,000 through five times from August 20, 2015, such as the list of crimes.

2. On September 26, 2015, the Defendant solely committed the Defendant’s criminal act posted a false advertisement stating that “The Defendant shall access the Internet opening site in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and sell 350,000 won to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the Defendant at around 15:50 on September 26, 2015.” The Defendant reported the false advertisement stating that “the Defendant would transfer KRW 350,000 to 350,000,000 to 15:50 on the same day.”

"2016 Highest 271"

3. The Defendant and D’s joint criminal act conspireds with the Defendant to acquire money under the name of the price for goods by spreading a letter to sell goods in the “severing cirls” book with smartphones.

A. On September 22, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement with D and D, at a place where it is difficult to identify the location, that read, “I would send the goods upon deposit of money,” the Defendant’s sales of the Canadian Kas XS PP PP PP trading on the smartphone “openter,” and the victim I who reported and contacted D and D.

However, there was no intention or ability to send the above goods to the victim.

The defendant as above.

arrow