logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고단2488
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 2488"

1. On January 21, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would deliver goods on the face of the transfer of the price first” to the victim C who contacted the online site “luxor 4 trillion shock shock” by accessing the Internet site “lux Web”.

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to deliver the game shots.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred KRW 43,00 as the price for goods to the Nonghyup Bank account under the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

2. On January 24, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would first transfer the price to the victim E by accessing the Internet site “NVD car page” to the effect that “The Defendant would deliver the mobile phone at the front of the transfer of the price.”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the mobile phone.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was remitted 30,000 won as the price for goods to the NongHyup Bank account under the name of the defendant on the same day.

3. On January 25, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would first transfer the cost to the victim F who contacted Samsung Ggallon by accessing the Internet site “(S3 mobile phone)” to “a single-specopter” at a place in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant sent a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would deliver the mobile phone on the face of the transfer of the cost.”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to deliver the mobile phone.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to this, 30,000 won of goods to the Nong Bank account under the name of the defendant on the same day.

arrow