logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.26 2012고합1792
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2012 Gohap1792】

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal administration of Defendant A is a person operating G from November 20, 201 to seven floors in the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F.

In order to attract participants to the service of WIBRO, Wireless Brodiband Internet), the victim KT Co., Ltd. has established a system that allows subscribers who use long-term services for a period from 24 months to 36 months to purchase high-priced Nowon-do at an installment during the period of using the service. The opening agency which concluded an entrustment contract with the victim company first purchased the Nowon-gu model designated in the victim company's company's computer network (A4S), and then entered the user's personal information and the Nowon-gu model number scheduled to deliver it in the victim company's computer network (A4S), and then operated the victim company in the manner that the user company would pay Nowon-do in a lump sum after the month to the opening agency.

The Defendant: (a) confirmed the purchase and payment of the ice number of the Not North Korea that the opening agency entered or notified by the opening agency in a computer; and (b) conspired with subordinate recruitment business entities, etc. in sequence, by soliciting subordinate recruitment business entities, etc. to invite persons in need of pay the relevant Not North Korea, and make a false application for the Not North Korea book with false subscription to the victim's company's hybrid services; and (c) the Defendant, instead of paying Not North Korea to the subscribers, intended to receive a certain amount of money from the subordinate recruitment business entities through cash settlement to the subordinate recruitment business entities; and (d) to have the subcontractor pay a certain amount of money to the subscribers; and (e) to request the victim to pay the purchase and payment of the Not North Korea unit.

The defendant conspireds with subordinate recruitment business entities, etc. in sequence, and around November 29, 2010, a subordinate recruitment business entity runs an Internet microcredit advertisement.

arrow