Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of three years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months.

However, the defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”) established for the purpose of selling television home shopping, etc. of IT products, such as computers and Nowon-gu, and Defendant B used the trade name “H” and “I” and recruited service subscribers.

From December 2009, the Victim KTT Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "victim Co., Ltd.") established a system by which the long-term service users can purchase the free trade zone at a higher rate during the service use period from 24 months to 36 months, and the opening-type agency which has concluded an entrustment contract with the victim Co., Ltd. purchased the free trade model designated by the victim Co., Ltd. first of all, entered the user's personal information and the number of the free trade zone scheduled for delivery into the victim Co., Ltd.'s computer network (A4S), and operated the victim Co., Ltd. in the way that the user Co., Ltd. will provide the free trade zone with the employee's personal information and the free trade zone number scheduled for delivery (A4S), and then deliver the relevant free trade zone along with the core chips, the victim Co., Ltd. will provide the free trade zone price and the open transport subsidy to

The defendants abuse the fact that the victim company purchased and paid the ice number of the Not North Korea that the opening agency entered or notified by the opening agency of the victim company to verify the purchase and payment of the Not North Korea, and then conspired with subordinate recruitment business entities, etc. in order with subordinate recruitment business entities, etc. to invite people in need of pay the relevant Not North Korea, and make a request for the Not North Korea register with false subscription to the victim company's Hybro service. The defendants, in lieu of paying Not North Korea to the subscribers, made the subcontractor cash and make the subcontractor pay a certain amount of money to the subscribers, and then requested the subcontractor to pay the purchase and payment of the Not North Korea unit, etc. by requesting the victim company to settle the price.