A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in the Changwon District Court's Jeju District Court's Jeju District Court's Jeju District Court's Jeju District Court's Jeju District Court's Jeju District Court's order on July 25, 2013. On July 3, 2014, the judgment was finalized on July 11, 2014.

The defendant operated by the defendant in Gyeongnam-gun C

D When the oriental medical hospital was closed down, while the hospital was closed down, the hospital was opened to the hospital, and the name was changed to the F convalescent, and the hospital was operated again. When the hospital was requested by H who supplied the medical equipment in the name of G medical aircraft to prepare a written contract for acceptance of the obligation to pay the above medical equipment in the name of E, the hospital was thought to prepare the above contract in the name of E.

1. On August 1, 201, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) at the F convalescent on or around August 1, 201, the Defendant agreed by E, and (b) gave his subordinate staff I consent; (c) instructed H to accept the obligation to pay the price under the name of E; and (d) I will accept the obligation to pay KRW 43,528,000 in total for medical devices supplied to D from G medical technicians to D, and pay the price in three installments from August 12, 201 to November 30, 201.

“Preparation and output of the E-name succession contract for the equipment (outstanding) under the name of E, and then affixing the seal of E in the name next to the E’s name.

As a result, the Defendant had I know of the circumstances prepare a contract for the succession of equipment (outstanding amount) and forged a copy of the contract for the succession of the above equipment (outstanding amount) which is a private document related to rights and obligations without authority for the purpose of exercising the contract.

2. Around August 2011, the Defendant exercised the foregoing investigation document by allowing I, who is well aware of the fact, to deliver a forged equipment (outstanding amount) succession contract to H by facsimile transmission or mail.

Summary of Evidence

1...