Defendant

J Imprisonment with prison labor for five years, for two years and six months, for Defendant N, for two years and for two years, for Defendant AA.

Punishment of the crime

[Personal Relationship] Defendant J is a person who is placed in office from July 2, 2005 to July 2, 2015 and ordered equipment related to electricity to the customer and is in charge of managing the inventory of equipment. Defendant N is a person who has ordered equipment related to electricity to the customer from November 9, 2005 to November 9, 2005 and has been in charge of managing electronic equipment. Defendant L is a person who is in charge of managing equipment to the customer. Defendant Z is the president of AW agency that supplies equipment to the above M; Defendant A is the president of AW agency that supplies equipment to the above M; Defendant A is the vice president of the aboveO that supplies equipment to the above M; C is the P's employee that supplies equipment to the above P; and Defendant Z is a person who supplies equipment to the above M.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant J, Defendant N, and Defendant N indicated in the indictment “7:3 ratio” in relation to the distribution ratio among the accomplices of breach of trust in the judgment of 75:25 of the ratio of 75:25 of the 75:25 of the 75:25 of the 75:5 of the 75:25 of the 75: deposit of money in M., but Defendant A asserts that the ratio is 75:25, and Defendant A remitted 75% of the 75% amount of breach of trust to the account of Defendant J., Defendant N, and Defendant A. The 75:25 of the 75:25 of the 75:5 of the 75:25 of the 75.25 of the 75.25 of the 75.25 of the 7.25 of the 7.25.

However, the distribution ratio among accomplices does not affect the gender of breach of trust and the amount of breach of trust, so this part of the facts charged should be corrected simply.

A. The defendant J and the defendant N are in charge of divided shares, following the consent of the defendant A.