A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:40 on March 15, 2014, the Defendant, entering the Maart in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and stolen it by gathering one stop of “Ulle Drie Drie Drie Drie Drie Drie Drie Drie Drie Drie Drie Drie Ye Drie Ye Drie Ye Ye 13,00 won at the market price, which was displayed in the display stand by taking advantage of the gaps in which the surveillance by the victim B, who managed the said Maart, was negligent.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime. Article 329 (Options of Imprisonment)

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspension of execution is that the Defendant repeats an act that steals goods from marina without any particular reason despite the fact that the Defendant was not in an economically weak condition from around 2012, and that the Defendant committed a second offense despite three times of a fine, the Defendant is selected to be sentenced to imprisonment in that he/she committed a second offense; however, the enforcement of the sentence is suspended in consideration of the injury and the victim’s failure to want the punishment.