1. The defendant's notary public D, which belongs to the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office against the plaintiffs, was prepared on July 11, 2012, No. 650.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) is a company that manufactures the column (markboard) containing the world, Plaintiff B is an internal director as the representative of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the wife of Plaintiff B.

When the defendant is an enterprise specialized in energy saving prescribed in Article 25 of the Energy Use Rationalization Act and intends to supplement existing energy use facilities for energy saving, it is a company that operates an energy saving-type facility by receiving funds from the Energy Management Corporation, and distributes the results of energy saving (hereinafter referred to as “ESS investment project”).

B. The column manufactured by the Plaintiff A is the process of building a dried by a heat supplied in a drying machine, moving the 1st floor and the 20th floor length connected to the string unit from the string unit to the string unit, and moving the string unit from the 20th floor length connected to the string unit to the string unit to the string unit. The Plaintiff (A) installed several burners using the string gas as fuel and supplied the string unit through the string unit to the string of the heat generated from the string unit.

C. On July 3, 2012, Plaintiff A and the Defendant entered into a contract on the performance distribution of the ESCO investment project, which changed the heat supply method of the said drying machine into a “RP gas combustion facility” method using the PEF fuel (any solid fuel created from waste plastics) instead of the existing LNG burnerner method and supplies the heat to the heat drieder, while entering into a contract on the performance distribution of the ESCO investment project that changed the heat to the “RPF gas combustion facility” method in which Plaintiff A, Defendant, and household members, the contractor of the said project, terminate, suspend, or suspend the said contract without a three-party agreement, Plaintiff A should compensate the Defendant for the amount of 400 million won out of the amount of loss suffered by the Defendant, and to secure this.