logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.04.04 2014고단54
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A In October, 10, Defendant B was punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, Defendant C was punished by a fine of 1,50,000 won, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-principal Defendant A operated a game room without trade name on the first floor underground of the building located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, and Defendant B, C, and D were employees of the above game room.

Defendant

A within the above game room from October 14, 2013 to October 17, 2013, within the game software rating committee, A installed 41 game for the ocean-going game which was not classified by the game software rating committee, 10 games, and CCTV, and Defendant B, C, and D employed Defendant B as an employee, C, and C, C, and D clean-up of the drinking water depth and the game room. Defendant A paid 10,000 won in cash to many unspecified customers who found the above game, so that customers would use the above card to make the game for the above sea-going game, etc., and converted the game into 10,000 won in cash per 10,000 won acquired by the customers according to the result.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide ungraded game products for use, and exchanged tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

(1) After the completion of the game, 10% of the face-to-face score of the game is deducted from the face-to-face score after the completion of the game. (2) The sole criminal conduct of Defendant D

A. On October 17, 2013, the Defendant entered “F” and “G” in the name column in the name column of a person who, without authority, received from a police officer in charge of control of his name to enter the developments leading to the work in the above game site, etc. for the purpose of exercising his/her right, and entered the particulars leading to the work in the above game site as “F” and “F on October 17, 2013.”

As a result, the Defendant forged one copy of the name of F, a private document concerning rights, duties, or certification of facts.

B. The Defendant is aware of the foregoing date, time, place, and time.

arrow