Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

In light of the records of this case, there is no obstacle to the defendant's exercise of his right to defense, and basic facts were appropriately revised and recognized within the same scope.

The Defendant and B, C, D, E, F, and G have attempted to obtain insurance proceeds by intentionally paying traffic accidents or neglecting the degree of injury through hospitalization in a hospital.

On May 11, 2015, around 15:50, the Defendant and B et al. looked around the vicinity of the vehicle set up in the vicinity of the Jinscam Scam Scam Scam Intersection, B, and C, and D et al. were driven by the Defendant himself while following the I K5 vehicle that the Defendant is mixed with with the cub vehicle in H, E, F, and G while moving into the cub vehicle and driving by the Defendant, the Defendant et al. had the previous Defendant et al. al., as agreed in advance, did not her U.S., while driving the vehicle.

K5 Republic of Korea was followed by the lower part of the passenger car

I tried to intentionally shock the front part of the Kusa car.

However, the above traffic accident was the most intentional accident that the defendant, B, C had committed in advance with D, E, F, and G, and thus, it was not necessary to receive hospital treatment due to this reason.

Nevertheless, he was on board the Cub car.

D, E, F, and G were hospitalized in a neighboring hospital on the same day on the grounds of the traffic accident in question, and were hospitalized in a nearby hospital on May 12, 2015. Around May 12, 2015, the victim merts Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. filed a claim of KRW 3,448,230 under the name of medical expenses and vehicle repair expenses, and the victim received the business insurance money from the victim and divided the money with the Defendant, B, and C.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with B, C, D, E, F, and G, by deceiving the victim's Matts Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. and by deceiving 3,448,230 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspects of E and D by the prosecution (second time);

1. B, C, and F.