logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.05.12 2015고정691
전자기록등손괴업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From January 1, 2010 to June 2, 2015, the Defendant served as the representative director of D, a complainant who manufactures Hegel, etc., medical suppliesing, etc., and was in charge of the production, packing, supply, and settlement of documents.

Defendant for the same year

5. The transfer of a company to a police officer was brought about by the complainant, who is the wife of the defendant, due to family problems and job placement problems, and the resignation of the representative director of the company.

On June 2, 2015, the Defendant destroyed documents, such as a printed design, material test report, a written request for purchase, a statement of transaction, a material order order (supply), a material inventory statement, a material inventory statement statement, a payment ledger, a principal transaction data, a foreign employment agency document, various packaging labelings, etc., which were stored in the Nowon-gu computer that had been used by the business company after being divided into the horses from the complainant at the office of the credit rating company, around 10:00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The defendant asserts that he/she does not harm the utility of the investigation report (the attachment of the removed materials after deletion) (the defendant asserts that the deleted materials are kept separately or need not be kept separately by the company.

However, according to the above evidence, it can be seen that the deleted materials are not owned by the defendant but owned by the company. The defendant's representative director was not kept in custody of the above materials for the company for the personal purpose, and it was not kept for the personal purpose, and there is no reason to delete the materials stored in the materials, and the materials deleted by the defendant cannot be seen as having no utility as related to the company's business.

arrow