1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of premise;

A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of printing of glass, printing of glass surface, drawing of glass, manufacturing and selling of glass name, etc. The Defendant is a company established for the purpose of glass printing business, glass processing business, etc., and both the Plaintiff and the Defendant have manufactured and sold design glass products upon receiving orders from the construction company that newly constructs apartment units or the interior company.

B. On January 201 through February 201, the Plaintiff: (a) filed a request with the “HF,” a producer of glass products; and (b) manufactured the prototypes of each glass product listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “Plaintiff products”; and (c) if each product is referred to, it refers to “1 or 4” according to the sequence of the above list.

C. On February 18, 2011, Hung Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SP”) ordered the Defendant to manufacture and supply the glass products listed in the [Attachment 2] List on February 20, 201 (hereinafter “Defendant products”) to be used in the apartment model housing construction work in the construction site of this case, which were implemented by Heung Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the construction site of this case”). The Defendant manufactured and supplied the apartment products in accordance with the above list Nos. 2, 201 (hereinafter “Defendant products”), and used the apartment model products in the apartment model.

After that, between January and March 2013, the Defendant supplied the Defendant’s products to the Jinsung Fast Co., Ltd., a supplier of the instant construction site, and the Defendant’s products were used at the construction site of this case.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 6, 8, 9, 11, 18, 21 through 29, 33, Eul evidence Nos. 8, 16, 17, 27, 31 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the Plaintiff’s products around January and February 201.