logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.05 2014가합13216
디지인권 침해 등을 원인으로 한 손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a corporation established for the purpose of printing and combining glass, manufacturing and selling a name of glass, etc., and mainly carries on the business of manufacturing and delivering the glass products with a pattern design in accordance with the orders of the construction company that mainly constructs apartment units, or the interior management company. 2) The Defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing construction materials, printing and processing business of glass, or interior management business, etc., and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and supplying glass products with a design in the construction site of new apartment units, etc. like the Plaintiff.

B. 1) The Plaintiff’s product manufactured and registered as a glass product is 6 glass products as shown in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s product.” The Plaintiff’s product is hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s product.” The Plaintiff’s product is hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s product if all of them are named

product of the Plaintiff after production, among them

1. On June 2, 201, each application for design registration, filed on June 2, 201, and completed the registration on February 1, 2012.

2) On the other hand, SPS Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SPS”) in charge of performing interior works at the site of new apartment construction works, such as a kitchen.

(A) On May 20, 201, the construction site for the apartment model housing model site (hereinafter “instant construction site”) to the Plaintiff on May 20, 201.

c) The manufacturing and supply of the Defendant’s glass products, each of the instant glass products produced by the Plaintiff around July 201, and six glass products, the product form or design of which are similar, (hereinafter “Defendant products”).

A) supplied B at the construction site of this case. [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute or no clear dispute, and each description of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (if any, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

. Oral proceedings.

arrow