logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.03.13 2016가단3120
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The party-related Plaintiff A is a patient who was administered by the Defendants at the “E Hospital” operated by the Defendants (hereinafter “the instant hospital”) and undergoes the flachicing process, and Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Defendant C is a doctor who performed the flachicing procedure with Plaintiff A.

B. On June 5, 2013, Plaintiff A entered the instant hospital to undergo a health examination, and was subject to the said internal border and internal border test. Plaintiff A received an escape-resistant nuclear diagnosis on the same day, around 14:00 on the same day, Plaintiff A received a crypary flacing surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”) using the CPH (pactics) from Defendant C at the instant hospital, and Plaintiff A complained of the cryp flacing certificate around 10:00 on June 6, 2013 following the day, and Defendant C took a part in the workplace inspection, but was not found any other part of the workplace. On the same day, Plaintiff A was found to have been flaced by having been at work using the CPH (pactics) around 14:00.

3) On June 7, 2013, Defendant C performed national anesthesia, and performed the flaging to the flag of the workplace concerned, and thereafter, Defendant C transferred the Plaintiff to F Hospital, which is a superior hospital, around 17:00 on the same day, due to the occurrence of clothes expansion, low flagic acid, etc., and Plaintiff A was subject to the flaging infection operation at around 19:50 on the same day. Plaintiff A diagnosed the Plaintiff on June 7, 2013 as “A of the flaging flag of a primary disease, an injury-causing shock shock, an injury-related flaging flag, and an injury-related flaging flag of a single flag,” and diagnosed Plaintiff A as “A on June 7, 2013.

Plaintiff

A was hospitalized for 112 days at the F Hospital after an acute diversatitis surgery conducted on June 7, 2013, and until September 26, 2013.

C. 1 Relevant medical knowledge 1) The advantage of the CPH (originally automated steincincincinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc inc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incin

arrow