1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 12,00,000, and KRW 8,000,000 to the Plaintiff B, and each of the said money, the Defendant from October 11, 2013 to October 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties concerned are educational foundations operating a single university hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”). The plaintiff A is the spouse of the deceased C (hereinafter “the deceased”) and the plaintiff B is the deceased’s children.

B. On January 2013, 2013, the Deceased: (i) viewed 2.4cm of 2.4cm as an extractor on the part of ductal clock, and (ii) was diagnosed as a ductal wing at the Yancheon National University Hospital; (iii) on August 20, 2013, the Deceased moved to the Defendant Hospital.

On September 13, 2013, the Defendant Hospital had the deceased carry out an romatic recogrative regrative and regratized and returned home.

3) On September 11, 2013, the Deceased hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital to undergo an internal ephesion. On September 12, 2013, the Defendant Hospital performed an internal epidemal ephesion to check the operation department. On September 12, 2013, the Deceased performed an internal ephetoral ephetoral ephetoral ephetoral ephetoral ephetoral ephetorical ephetorical ephetorical ephetoral lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehetoric lehec.

Accordingly, the defendant hospital dealt with the cromatic cromatic cromatic schedule, and performed the preservation treatment of acute cromatic cromatic cropitis (pharmaceuticals, liquid cropism, dropism). On September 23, 2013, the blood examination conducted conducted on September 23, 2013, confirmed that acute cropitis was crophosome, and tried to observe the process and plan the operation schedule again, and then discharged the deceased.

5) On October 1, 2013, the Deceased was subject to blood examination at the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant Hospital’s hospital on October 11, 2013 (hereinafter “instant surgery”) on the part of the Deceased, i.e., wing-up wing-up surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

6) On October 10, 2013, the Deceased was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital after his implementation.

The defendant hospital is delegated with the authority of the deceased to consent to the operation.