logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.02 2016가단5042490
손해배상(건)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in light of the following facts: (a) there is no dispute between the parties; (b) evidence No. 3; (c) evidence No. 4-1; and (d) evidence No. 4-2; and (c) evidence No. 1; (d) evidence No. 2; and (e) evidence No. 3; and (e) evidence No. 4.

On December 14, 2014, the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction contract”) who was awarded a contract for the “D New Construction Project” located in Jongno-gu Seoul (Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul), Jongno-gu Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “D New Construction Project”) entered into a construction contract (including value-added tax) with the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction contract”) with respect to the said construction project, the total contract amount of which is KRW 1,012,00,000,000 (including value-added tax, regardless of whether it was before or after the mutual change; hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction contract”).

B. At around 09:55 on June 24, 2015, E and F, an employee of the non-party company, engaged in the construction of the instant stone on the 12th floor of the said new building at the 12th floor of the said new building, with a width of 53 cm, vertical length of 123 cm, thickness of 3 cm, weight of 20 km, attached to the outer wall of the building, so that the said high-interest stone was set off front of the said construction site, and the said high-interest stone was cut down on the top of the said construction site, and was the Plaintiff in the Seoul Central District Court 2016Kadan509 (Case) against the Defendant, who was working within the said store due to protruding G store glass, and thereby doing so.

The plaintiff in the Seoul Central District Court 2016Kadan5041695 compensation case against the defendant is the plaintiff in the case where the defendant suffered injuries, such as the catum catum catum, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Around two weeks of medical treatment, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as an internal eye and neck around the table, and the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as a multi-culatory bid that requires medical treatment for about two weeks of medical treatment.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). 2. Summary of the parties’ assertion

arrow