beta
Text
1. He/she confirms that the Plaintiff owns a field B of 642 square meters in Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-gun;
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. According to the Ministry of Land Survey in Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, the period of Japanese occupation, the 2,880 square meters (hereinafter “instant land before the instant partition”) stated that E having a domicile in C was under the circumstances of the Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, Seoul.
B. The land before the instant partition was divided into ① 2,646 square meters of D cemetery, ② 3,248 square meters of F miscellaneous land, ③ G cemetery 2,975 square meters, ④ 33 square meters of H cemetery, ⑤ 155 square meters of J cemetery 6 square meters of J cemetery, and ⑤ 155 square meters of J cemetery 6 square meters of the land after the registration of preservation of ownership was completed under the Plaintiff’s name; ④, ⑤ each land was included in the Rural Partition and Rearrangement Project, and ④, ⑤ each land was replaced with the land, 642 square meters of Gcheon-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, 1979 (hereinafter “instant land”) on November 2, 1979.
C. On January 11, 1924, E, the assessment title of the land before the instant partition, died, and the said property was inherited solely to K, who is an son, and upon the death of K on April 5, 1951, K solely inherited the said property.
On the other hand, L had his wife P and Q, Ma, N,O, and children, and died on February 26, 1987. Since L’s death, six inheritors, including the Plaintiff, prepared a written agreement on the division of inherited property on March 7, 2014 and completed the agreement on the division of inherited property by the Plaintiff’s sole inheritance of the instant land.
The defendant asserted that the plaintiff cannot believe the fact that the plaintiff is the inheritor because the plaintiff was merely a private document that was submitted by E or K without submitting a transcript of the specifications of E or K. However, the family form leading to E, K, L, and P is consistent with L's specifications (Evidence A 3-1), and there is no circumstance that the plaintiff's report was forged because it was copied among the copies of the National Library of Korea on May 16, 2006.