Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 2, 2018, at around 23:25, the Defendant: (a) avoided the performance of official duties; (b) the Defendant: (c) avoided the disturbance of the Defendant: (a) from the Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (a) reported the loss of a Handphone by a customer in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 2, 2018; (b) the background F of the Seoul mobile Police Station E District; and (c) the Defendant: (b) “Handphones must be checked before a clerical error is clerical error in the singing book; and (c) the Defendant sent the Defendant a voice to the said police officer to find a Handphone within the scope of the audience’s view; and (d) the said G “within this Chewing year, a bit phone, a bitch bitch bit, a bitch bitch bitch bit

Recognizing that “the F” was “the said F did so, and when the F prevented it, the F did so by hand, and assaulting the said F’s chest by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and at the victim G who was dispatched after being reported to 112, is a public official in the situation where many people, such as the president, etc., look at this Chewing year, handphone, bit of bitch, bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bitch, bit of a bitch,

In a large sense, the victim publicly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. A complaint filed by G;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the aggregate of the amounts of the above two crimes) shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant was punished by a fine for obstructing the performance of official duties in around 2009. However, the exclusion of the sentence is without any particular criminal record, the degree of physical records exercised by the police officer in this case is not much serious, and the defendant is in depth against the crime.