1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The status of the party (1) The Defendant Educational Institute D (hereinafter “Defendant Educational Institute D”) is a juristic person that establishes and operates G Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) in Busan Shipping Daegu F, and the Defendant E is a person who works as a doctor in blood species and medicine at the Defendant Hospital.

(2) The Plaintiff A and C are parents of the deceased H (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the Plaintiff B is the birth of the deceased.

B. (1) The Deceased’s diagnosis and surgery (1) conducted at the Defendant Hospital’s hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) caused the joints of the oral and regional symptoms, two parts, and both arms and legs, and around August 11, 2014, and the Defendant E conducted image tests, blood tests, and pelvis tests with respect to the Deceased, which led to the increase in the deceased’s white blood size from 300,000 to 420,000/uL (the normal range of 4,000 to 10,000/L) and confirmed that the ecirical levicosis cells cells in the white cells account for about 90%, and the Defendant E conducted a eclific lecosis diagnosis with respect to the Deceased on August 12, 2014.

(2) On August 17, 2014, the deceased’s urine was also discharged from urine, and there was a symptoms showing that the left eye of the eye flows, and that the color cannot be distinguished, Defendant E conducted blood transfusion. On August 18, 2014, Defendant E diagnosed that the urine disorder was caused by “the blood urine urine urine urine and urine urine urine urine urine urine” after the Deceased’s internal knowledge and examination on the deceased.

(3) On August 18, 2014, around 23:20, the deceased began to undergo a change in the life and body of the deceased, when there were symptoms leading to her blood ties together with an empty (the symptoms where the heart felbling was rapidly 100 times or more per minute due to illicit connection). Defendant E, around 01:04 on August 19, 2014, performed an cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Spon to verify the possibility of the occurrence of acute cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Spony, confirmed as a result, performed an cerebral cerebral cerebral Spony, and performed an institutional inserting on August 19, 2014 through a compromise with medical professionals at the Defendant hospital, and performed an cerebral eption on August 19, 2014 (hereinafter “the first operation”).