beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Around February 27, 2017, the Deceased’s Board members and treatment 1) of the deceased G (hereinafter “the deceased”) considered that there is an error between the results of the health examination conducted within I and the results of the health examination, and on March 13, 2017, the H Hospital run by the F, the Defendant Incorporated Foundation (hereinafter “Defendant H Hospital”).
(2) On March 14, 2017, Defendant H Hospital medical personnel recommended the deceased to undergo an additional examination and treatment after having hospitalized the deceased, suspected of alcohol liver and inter-cell cancer. (3) Defendant H Hospital’s medical personnel conducted with respect to the deceased on March 14, 2017, there was a 4-8 7.2 cm inter-cell cancer and chronic pyropitis, and there was no opinion to be transferred on the chest CT and pel cans.
3) On March 16, 2017, the Deceased is deemed to have a chemical chronological chronology for the treatment of liver-cell cancer on March 16, 2017.
(3) On March 20, 2017, the deceased was discharged from Defendant H Hospital on March 20, 2017, on the following day: (a) the medical personnel of Defendant H Hospital diagnosed and observed the progress of the diagnosis as a heat (PEF) after coloring. (b) The deceased was discharged from the hospital on March 20, 2017.
B. On March 21, 2017, the Deceased-Namnam University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Jeonnam University Hospital”) was located in the Defendant Jeonnam University Hospital in the main lake and marsh around 15:31 on March 21, 2017.
(2) At the time, the medical personnel at the Defendant Jeonnam Hospital was in charge of general blood test (CBC), clinical chemical test, and blood cultivation test with respect to the deceased. The number of 00/Gulla (WBC) values increased to 2400/Gulla (the normal 400-100/ Gulla). The medical personnel at the Defendant Jeonnam Hospital was in charge of 91% of cambane, 96/40 of cambling water, and 20 times of cambacs. However, the medical personnel at the Defendant Jeonnam Hospital was in charge of cambacing the possibility of infection in light of the deceased’s symptoms and the increase of cambacsiums.