logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.12 2016고단2561
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 3, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (such as a driver’s assault, etc.) was driving the victim B (64 S) on the back seat of the Plaintiff’s KNN Broadcasting Station located in the Gu KNNdong-dong, Busan on April 19:45, 201, and was driving on the back seat of the victim B (64 S) on the front of the white-style apartment located in the Busan Jindong-dong, Busan, Jin-gu, Busan, and was working on the front of the white-style apartment located in 409, Busan, Jin-gu, Busan, on the 409 e.

It was time to shoulder the right side of the victim who was in possession of Mad Coup and set up a car."

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. At the time of the day specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) expressed the defect B’s desire to listen to the details of the report from the Busan Police Station D branch of the Busan Police Station D branch of the Police Station, which was called “the 112 report from the Busan Police Station; (b) held E, who recommended E to continue to pay the taxi expenses and return home, with a receipt of the taxi; and (c) stated, “I will pay E a non-tax receipt for “I will be punished if I would be less than I would be able to do so; and (d) I would like to commit assault against the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (Assaults, drivers, etc.) and the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of the Specific Crimes, as described in paragraph (1), and who was arrested by the flagrant offender, from among those who were arrested due to insult, insult, fraud, etc. against B.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 report processing and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to B and E;

1. Article 5-10(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the point of assault by a driver) and the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts.

arrow