logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.05.02 2017가합201105
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: 165,103,532 won, Plaintiff B, and C respectively; and 54,01,833 won, Plaintiff D; and Plaintiff B.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Party’s status 1) the network G is a person who operated H, and the network I is a person employed by the network G and a person who was employed by the network G. 2) The Plaintiff A is the wife of the network G, the Plaintiff B, and C are the children of the network G, and the Plaintiff D is the wife of the network I, the Plaintiff E, and the F are the children of the network I.

3) The Defendant is a corporation established pursuant to Article 76(1) of the Local Public Enterprises Act with the aim of contributing to the efficient management and operation of environment-related facilities and the promotion of citizens’ convenience and welfare through the promotion of projects. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the management and operation of sewage terminal treatment facilities, sanitary treatment facilities, and the management and operation of the sanitary treatment facilities. Nonparty J was a person who was in charge of concluding the following contracts with the network G as the deputy head of the KK branch of the Defendant’s KK Business. B. On October 10, 2016, the formation network G of the instant oral contract is an employee of the Defendant Corporation, who is a contracting officer, between J and the said deceased, located in the Defendant K office (hereinafter “instant

2) As to the part of the Plaintiff, the part of the lower court’s judgment against the Plaintiff is justifiable. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

2) The oral consultation was made on the contract to implement (hereinafter “instant oral agreement”).

C. C. At the time of the instant accident, J reported that the instant construction was carried out on the day to M of the team leader on October 24, 2016, the date of the instant construction work.

Accordingly, M has ordered the warden to check the fact that the contract has not been executed formally, and M has not been executed.

2) In order to obtain the approval of the Director, J carried out the document work related to the approval during the morning, and around 14:00, the Director of J approved the approval of the Director. 3) The deceased started the instant construction work from the same day, and even after continuing to carry out the construction on the instant fire extinguishing tank at around 16:30, there is an accident that the mertan gas inside the said fire extinguishing group explosions by the unexplosible source.

arrow