1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Out of the first floor of the building listed in the Schedule A, the indication of the Annex A, (a), (b), (c), (d), (d), (d), (d) of the Annex A;

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 7, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant order No. 1-A.

From February 7, 2014 to February 6, 2016, the term “instant building” (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) entered into a lease agreement to lease KRW 30,000 (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease agreement”) with the end of February 7, 2014, KRW 25 million, monthly rent of KRW 1.65 million (excluding value-added tax, KRW 25,000,000,000 (excluding value-added tax; KRW 25,000 per month; and KRW 25,000,000 per month after deducting the term of authorization).

B. The Defendant paid the Plaintiff monthly rent, KRW 1.68 million on March 26, 2014, KRW 1.6 million on April 29, 2014, KRW 500,000 on July 14, 2014, KRW 200,000 on August 8, 2014, and KRW 1.65 million on November 15, 2014.

(total amount of 7.430,000 won).

The defendant is an order 1-B of the plaintiff's ownership used as a parking lot of the building listed in the attached Table 1, including the building of this case.

The unit part of the port (hereinafter referred to as the “instant land”) is filled up with interior materials, business materials, etc., and partitions were installed between the next building and the adjacent building.

[Based on Recognition] Evidence Nos. 1, 20-1 to 20, 3, 10-3, 11, 12-1 to 6, 14-1 to 14-3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, the Defendant’s failure to pay the Plaintiff the monthly rent of KRW 7,260,000 (i.e., KRW 1650,00 x 1.1 x 4 months) in excess of the amount of rent for the second period (i.e., KRW 7260,000) and on the ground of two or more years of delay, the fact that the Plaintiff’s application for change of the cause of claim on July 1, 2014, indicating the intent to terminate the instant lease agreement, was clearly recorded in the electronic record, and thus, the instant lease agreement was legally terminated on July 25, 2014.

Therefore, the defendant delivers the building of this case to the plaintiff, removes each of the goods listed in the attached Table 3 attached hereto, which is loaded or installed on the land of this case, and the delay is made until October 25, 2014.