The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) during the process of the construction of the F Multi-household Construction Project implemented by the building owner C and D under the subcontracting of the F Multi-household Construction Project; (b) while occupying the above multi-household housing, G, a creditor of the early July 2010 when visiting the above multi-household housing; and (c) he presented a copy of the “Agreement on the Construction of the Building in the Construction” for the change of the name of the owner of the said multi-household housing built in G, C, and D, despite the fact that he/she had confirmed whether it was prepared, he/she did not appear to be the witness of the Daejeon District Court No. 231, Jun. 1, 2012, the Daejeon District Court No. 2011No 5548, the said court was present before being sworn as a witness of the foregoing case; and (d) he/she did not appear to have any testimony or testimony under the name of the witness, stating that he/she had no other written questioning or testimony.

2. The perjury under Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act is established when a witness who has taken an oath under the law makes a false statement contrary to his memory. Whether the witness’s testimony is a false statement contrary to his memory is not a part of the simple framework of his testimony, but a whole testimony in the examination procedure is identified as one of the whole.