logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.06.12 2014노963
위증
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the defendant's false statement among the testimony in this case stated to the effect that "the defendant did not see even if he had shown the agreement in this case." Although the court below found the whole testimony of the defendant as a whole and judged whether to give perjury, the court below found the defendant not guilty by erroneous determination of the summary of the defendant's testimony by taking advantage of the abstract part of the defendant's testimony. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts and adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. On June 20, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. in this court. On October 5, 2013, the said judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant: (a) During the process of construction of the F Multi-household Construction Works implemented by the building owner C and D under the subcontracting of the F Multi-household Construction Works; (b) on July 2010, G, a creditor of the first police officer, etc., and his/her conduct, visited the above multi-household housing; (c) despite having verified whether G was prepared or not, at the court of Daejeon District Court 231 on June 15:30, 201, located in Seo-gu, Daejeon District Court 201Da5548, the aforementioned court was present and taken an oath as a witness of the Defendant case, such as fabrication of private documents to D, and thus failing to receive the construction cost; and (d) on July 2010, G, a creditor of the first police officer, etc., and his/her conduct to visit the above multi-household housing; and (d) on June 1, 2012, he/she did not appear as a witness at the place of questioning or having made testimony with G’s testimony.

arrow