logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.11.30 2016고단790
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant resided in D 402, which is the studio building owned by the Defendant in Gwangjuyang-si, and managed the building, and the victim E (V, 46 years old) resided in the above D.

From November 2014 to April 21:50, 2015, the Defendant installed a small camccoer at the home of the victim, which became aware of the victim for the purpose of photographing the body of the victim by installing a small camccoer in front of the victim’s studio room, and installed a door door with the victim’s secret number and auxiliary heat managed by the Defendant, and intrudes the victim’s dwelling into the house and intrudes the victim’s dwelling. From November 2014 to April 22:30, 2015, the Defendant taken pictures of the victim’s body against the victim’s will by photographing the victim’s body.

2. Determination 1) The finding of guilt ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads a judge to confluence that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is suspicion of guilt against the defendant, the determination is inevitable in the interests of the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Do2255, Jul. 23, 2015). 2) In the instant case, evidence and circumstances as to the fact that a person who installed a small camping cam in intrusion upon the victim’s house is the defendant, the statement made by the victim’s investigative agency that there is no person suspected of suspicion except the defendant who is the principal offender, the male cam in the small camping cam, which is similar to the defendant’s face, and similar to the defendant’s face.

arrow