Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten (10) months of imprisonment at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 8, 2012, and on September 4, 2014, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced eight (8) months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, which became final and conclusive on November 4, 2014.

The Defendant did not have any connection with C and did not have been authorized to use the corporate sense of the above C, and instead did not have any fact that he carried out or subcontracted the new E construction in North Korea-U.S. D, the Defendant was willing to acquire money from the victim F as if he did to do electrical construction during the new construction of the Riart, even though he did not have any connection with C.

1. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of falsified investigation documents;

A. A. Around July 4, 2008, the Defendant, using a computer located in the area, forged one copy of the standard contract for private construction works in the name of “E New Construction”, “E New Construction (Electronic Construction),” “One hundred and twenty billion won in the contract amount column,” and “The Department of Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do” in the order of the order of the work, and forged one copy of the standard contract for private construction works in the name of C without authority for the purpose of exercising the right by sealing the corporate seal of C, a stock company, which was well-established in advance, adjacent to the order of the order of the work.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, issued the standard form of the contract for private construction works that was forged to F and exercised as if they were duly formed.

2. In fact at the same date, time, and place as set forth in paragraph 1(a), the defrauded made a forged standard contract with the victim F, stating that “In spite of no intention or ability to subcontract electrical construction during the new construction work, the victim would be awarded a subcontract for the electrical construction work amounting to KRW 2.8 billion.”