A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The defendant shall be ordered to attend a sexual assault treatment program for 24 hours.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 22, 2013, the injured Defendant suffered injuries to the Dambus, including two cages, which require approximately five weeks of medical treatment, because he or she was her son E (the 77 years of age) and her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

2. Indecent acts by compulsion;

A. On April 3, 2013, around 16:55, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim on the part of the victim G (n, 58 years of age) who was staying in F at the home room of the victim G (n, the Defendant’s 58 years of age) with his mind to force indecent act by force, and by inducing the victim’s resistance from his hand, and by inducing the victim’s resistance, “one defect before the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.”

B. From Jun. 2013 to July 2013, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force on the part of the victim’s chests by dividing the victim’s chests that were likely to grow down at the same port location from Jun. 2013 to Jul. 2013, and suppressing the victim’s chests into two descendants, and by forcing the victim’s chests to grow up.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. The Defendant’s partial statement of the protocol of interrogation of the suspect to the prosecution (E was sealed, and the statement that E was frighted or damaged) refers to Articles 124 and 125 of the investigative record of the Defendant’s interrogation record

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. A medical certificate (E received medical treatment on December 23, 2013, the following day of the instant case) (the Defendant and his/her defense counsel denied the fact of injury, but according to the above evidence evidence, the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on E is acknowledged. Also, according to the fact inquiry inquiry reply on January 23, 2015, there were medical records received from E from July 2012 to December 23, 2015, but it does not interfere with recognizing the Defendant’s injury because it is different from the pel pel pel, which is the instant injury.).