logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원포항지원 2016.10.27 2014가단2240
차량수리비반환 및 손해배상
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,480,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 28, 2014 to October 27, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The Plaintiff is Multisan Logistics Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Dasan Logistics”).

(C) B Kac Truck (hereinafter referred to as the “instant vehicle”).

(2) The Defendant is a corporation operating various vehicle maintenance business and vehicle parts sales business, etc., and is a company accepting the instant vehicle in accordance with the Plaintiff’s request for repair as seen below.

B. On January 27, 2014, the Plaintiff’s repair request (hereinafter “the first repair”) against the Defendant on the part of January 27, 2014 (hereinafter “the Plaintiff discovered that the said vehicle had been driven in the cooling water tank around January 27, 2014 while driving the instant vehicle, and requested the Defendant to repair the said vehicle by entering the Defendant’s factory. (2) The Defendant’s maintenance manager deemed that the said symptoms were caused by the damage to the Engine driver, and replaced the Engine driver by deeming that the said symptoms were caused. (3) In the course of the maintenance, the Plaintiff replaced the Engine driver, and found that the said vehicle was insufficient to have been driven in the said vehicle.

3) On January 28, 2014, the Plaintiff released the instant vehicle to the Defendant, and paid KRW 570,000 to the Defendant at the expense of replacing Engines, and KRW 279,400,00, respectively. (c) On February 5, 2014, the Plaintiff discovered that, while operating the instant vehicle released as above on February 5, 2014, while driving the instant vehicle, the Plaintiff opened a cooling system after stopping the engine, and that, at the same time, the same time as the low soil in the cooling system was protruding.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff towing the instant vehicle and re-entered it into the Defendant’s factory.

2. The Defendant’s maintenance manager determined that the air cooling water is leakageed, compressed gas is leakageed and compressed gas is generated in the parts above the Hdgas pockets of the instant vehicle Nos. 2 and 3, and that there was a shortage of drinking and cooling water shortage caused by not less than the project operator No. 4 of the same amount.

arrow