(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.07.19 2016나314473

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.07.19 2016나314473

용역비

Text

1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

Reasons

The main lawsuit and counterclaim are also examined.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that operates the business of manufacturing and selling automated machinery, and the Defendant is a company that operates the business of manufacturing and processing scrap metal.

B. On November 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested the Plaintiff to replace the string ton of the compressors of the compressors (hereinafter “instant compressors”); (b) the Defendant’s strawing part of the compressors (hereinafter “instant compressors”); and (c) requested the Plaintiff to replace the string ton of the compressors.

The plaintiff re-assigned the existing fashion standard that the defendant was placed in the skin tons, and purchased the relevant specifications to the defendant, and subsequently repaired the replacement of the fashion with the defendant purchased.

(2) The Defendant paid 2,095,720 won to the Plaintiff following the first repair at the time of the first repair (hereinafter “the first repair”). The Defendant still requested repair to the Plaintiff on May 26, 2015, while there was a new phenomenon in the compressors after the first repair. As a result, the Plaintiff’s employees dismantled the compressors, and found that the inside of the compressors were flicked (hereinafter “the first breakdown”). Accordingly, the Defendant removed the parts of the pulse by expanding the inner diameter of the compressors from 0340 to 0350, and changed the part of the pulse by making it possible for the Plaintiff to use the re-repaired by means of a wide-scale pulseing.

(hereinafter referred to as “second repair”). The repair cost incurred from the second repair is KRW 6,96,00 (including surtax). D. Since one week has not elapsed from the second repair, there was a new problem that a new accident occurred from the compression of the instant compression (hereinafter referred to as “second breakdown”). The Defendant is the Plaintiff.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2016.12.06 2016가단113259

-인천지방법원부천지원 2017.04.07 2016가단102780

-의정부지방법원 2018.12.13 2017나207766

-부산지방법원 2020.11.18 2020나44831

-부산지방법원 2015.12.03 2015노3208