beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for three months, each of the defendants B.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On April 24, 2020, the Defendants were sentenced to 14 years of imprisonment with labor for special robbery at Seoul High Court, and 5 years of imprisonment with labor for Defendant A, Defendant A, and Defendant B, respectively. The judgment became final and conclusive on July 23, 2020, and June 5, 2020, respectively.
【Criminal Facts】
"2019 Highest 2734"
1. On January 2019, the Defendants’ co-principaled the Defendants’ co-principaled in the territory of Gangwon-do, within a Moelel where it is difficult to know the trade name in the original state of Gangwon-do, and collected the number of the resident registration certificates of “D”, which Defendant A is the seat of Defendant A, in the name of D, to open the cell phone under the name of D, and then to raise a living cost by selling it (so-called the “portable
Accordingly, around 11:00 on January 18, 2019, the Defendants filed an application for the opening of a mobile phone as if Defendant A was able to run as if Defendant A was D, and would normally pay a mobile phone price and a mobile phone price in the name of D. However, the Defendants merely intended to sell a mobile phone to a mobile phone purchaser who was immediately connected with the Defendants with the Defendants, and did not have any intent or ability to pay a mobile phone price.
The Defendants conspired to induce the victim as above, and then acquired approximately KRW 3,410,000 in total market value from the victim, and acquired approximately KRW 256G 2 from the victim.
2. Defendant A and the injured party C were the relationship between Defendant A and the injured party on the premise of marriage.
On July 17, 2014, the Defendant: “Around July 17, 2014, the Defendant intending to pay the money to the victim with the interest of full-time avoidance. If the Defendant borrowed KRW 30 million to the Plaintiff by taking out a loan with the name of thener’s apartment as collateral, he/she would settle the money problem with the previous denial and use the money problem in the business for the last time.”
However, the defendant thought that he received money from the victim as gambling funds, etc., and used it as business funds or the victim.