A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months and a fine of up to five million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of a sexual traffic business with the trade name “B”.

At around 15:00 on May 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) rented the heading office 1733 of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Officetel; (b) employed female employees of D, etc.; (c) advertised the said office on the “E,” etc. website; and (d) provided 150,000 won to male buyers in the name of the name of the non-registered male who found the advertisement and received 150,000 won as the price for commercial sex acts; and (c) provided guidance to the heading office of the said office where D is located, and arranged for commercial sex acts from May 27, 2017 to May 29, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing enforcement sites and advertising photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 and Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Advertisement activities or brokerage activities using a medium with high propagation (one year to three years) in the increased area (one year) of two types (one year to three years), such as brokerage, etc. for commercial sex acts, etc., of commercial sex acts subject to the age of 19 or older, the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines (the scope of the recommended punishment);

2. The crime of this case, which is determined to be sentenced, is a crime that is highly harmful to society due to the commercialization of sex and harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals.

In addition, the fact that the defendant has promoted sexual traffic business through the Internet site with high radio wave is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case is against the defendant, there is no record of punishment exceeding the same type of crime and fine, and the defendant's age, sex, family relation, motive and result of the crime, and the scale and frequency of the business of arranging sexual traffic.