A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From December 5, 2015 to December 8, 2015, the Defendant operated an “officetel” in the trade name called “C” as “C” in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 703, and placed the instant officetel in the instant officetel. Upon receiving 80,000 won from customers as the price for sexual traffic, the Defendant employed female employees D on the condition that 1,40,000 won would be paid among them.

The defendant posted a commercial sex acts advertisement on the Internet site, such as "E," etc. for the above period, and then arranged commercial sex acts by having a male guest who reported the advertisement and found the above business place receive 8-2 million won in return for commercial sex acts, and let the above female employee lick the male guest, and sexual intercourse with the male guest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Advertisement activities or brokerage activities using a medium with high propagation (one year to three years) in the increased area (one year) of two types (one year to three years), such as brokerage, etc. for commercial sex acts, etc., of commercial sex acts subject to the age of 19 or older, the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines (the scope of the recommended punishment);

2. The elements of sentencing that are disadvantageous to the decision of sentence: The elements of sentencing that are favorable to the fact that the defendant has led to the confession and reflect of all of the crimes in this case by using the Internet with high radio wave, the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the scale and period of business, the age of the defendant, and the motive for crimes, etc., as shown in the arguments and records of this case.