logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.10.15 2019구합106698
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. On September 11, 2019, the information recorded in the attached Table 1 among the decision of disclosure of information (non-disclosure) made by the Defendant against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is a reporter of the Internet newspaper who resides in B.

B. On October 22, 2018, in order to build an E Center equipped with training, educational facilities, convenience facilities, etc. of national representatives D teams (hereinafter “C”), an incorporated association C (hereinafter “C”) offered a public recruitment for site selection, etc. to central administrative agencies and local governments, and among local governments participating in the said public recruitment, B market price was final for the first priority negotiation.

On August 1, 2019, C and B entered into an agreement on the E Center Construction Project (hereinafter “instant agreement”) and its construction project (hereinafter “instant project”).

C. On August 28, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for disclosure of the “E Center Establishment Project Agreement (a copy of the agreement signed by the actual party or a private person (hereinafter “instant agreement”) on August 1, 2019, instead of the output of the file).”

On September 11, 2019, the defendant rendered a decision to disclose information to the plaintiff (non-disclosure) for the following reasons.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”) The instant agreement is governed by the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”).

(C) The disclosure of confidential business information under Article 9(1)7 of the Act is likely to seriously undermine the legitimate interests of the corporation if disclosed.

E. Meanwhile, on August 1, 2019 upon which the instant agreement was concluded, the Defendant disclosed the main contents, etc. of the instant agreement under the title “F” as “F” on the B City website on the day of August 1, 2019. On the G website (H), an Internet newspaper, the Plaintiff, on August 28, 2019, published the printed copies of the instant agreement, in a state of exclusion from each provision of the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant output”).

[Ground of recognition] There is no dispute.

arrow