Defendant

B The defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000,000,00,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around November 21, 2012, Defendant A, within the scope of E, represented by Defendant A, the representative of Defendant A, the Defendant: (a) received contact from the victim B to the head of the E-factory in order to collect money from the victim B; (b) turn on the location of G between the escape; and (c) if the location was not known, he would take the machinery without taking the location; and (d) carried the victim B’s spath and spathing spath; and (b) committed assault to the victim B, such as fladry, spadum spad, and tension, which require the victim’s treatment for 14 days.

2. On the same day as Defendant B’s preceding paragraph, from 14:25 to 14:50 on the same day, the victim F, who is the factory site D, was charged with collecting money from the victim F, and found G between them, and the victim’s f, was able to sphere and sphere and sphere, and the factory cannot enter by sticking the factory door, thereby obstructing the victim’s factory business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (Attachment of a medical certificate for injury);

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant A who selects a fine: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of a fine;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant: (a) assaulted the Defendant’s fat, at the time and place indicated in the facts charged in the facts charged; (b) assaulted the Defendant’s fat, fat, bat, etc.; and (c) assaulted the Defendant’s fat, s

2. Defendant B and his defense counsel’s assertion that Defendant B did not have any spabling and spabn, and Defendant B did not have any spabn and spabn, and Defendant B did not have any spabnous intent or legitimate act in a passive and defensive manner to get out of the spabn situation.

3. Determination

A. First of all, in order to prove that Defendant B did flabbling and sculbling a bat around A, the health belt and its proof.