Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

1. On July 10, 2015, the Defendant was driving a victim D (64 years old) on the street in front of C in the Yasan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 10, 2015, and was driving a victim D (64 years old).

In E-si, there has been harmony on the ground that the defendant made a statement different from the defendant's opinion.

The Defendant, by hand, dumped the victim’s breath, dump, continued to dump the victim’s inside, and continued to dump the victim’s inside, and 7 times after drinking the victim’s inside and back water.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the victim’s base base, tension, dystyposis of head, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. On the ground that the Defendant prevented the Defendant from committing the act at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, 1, 15 times the victim F (51)’s inner surface and head were drinking and handed.

As a result, the defendant suffered bodily injury, such as the dystrophal typosis of head that must be treated for about 2 weeks, damage to sins, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts, each injury diagnosis letter, and black stuffs panding images;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that a written agreement which contains an agreement with the victims is already reflected in the fine amount of the summary order of this case.

In addition, considering the circumstances and results of the instant case, the fact that the Defendant was punished as an assault crime, there is no circumstance to reduce the fine amount of the instant summary order.