logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.06.08 2012구단94
국가유공자비해당결정처분취소등
Text

1. On April 7, 2011, the Defendant’s major interest pertaining to the Plaintiff’s “Integrative malone in the margin of half-month” was additionally disabled.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Army on December 19, 200, but was discharged from military service on May 21, 2002.

B. On May 23, 2002, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State to the Defendant on the “Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slives,” and the Defendant decided

However, the plaintiff was judged below the grade standard in a new physical examination enforced on October 30, 202, and was not registered as a person of distinguished service to the State and was finally dismissed.

C. On August 11, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for recognition of additional wounds with respect to “Integral Madral Madal Madal Madal Madal Madal Madal (hereinafter “Additional Madal Madal Madal Madal”). The Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement re-examines the Plaintiff as well as the above additional wounds, and re-examines whether the existing wounds fall under the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State. The additional wounds are difficult to recognize the relevance of official duties. Although the existing wounds are caused by official duties, the former Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (amended by Act No. 11041, Sep. 15, 2011; hereinafter “former Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State”). Accordingly, the Defendant determined that the additional wounds constituted the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State.

(hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant disposition”). D.

The plaintiff is dissatisfied with this and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but on October 1, 201.

arrow