A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 11, 2016, around 14:34, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by putting the victim F, an employee, in a store “E” located in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, by using a gap in which surveillance by the victim F, was neglected; and (b) putting the victim F, who was an employee, in a store, one female source of 529,000 won at the market price of possession of the victim.

2. At around 14:50 on the same day as Paragraph 1, the Defendant stolen the victim’s possession of the victim who was located in the display stand in the store by using the gaps in which the surveillance of the victim H, who is an employee, was neglected in the store, in the above D 1st floor “G” store, by means of cutting down one point at the market price equivalent to 600,000 won.

3. On March 15, 2016, around 15:44, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim L, an employee of the Defendant, from “K” store in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, by taking advantage of the gaps of 758,00 won at the market price of the victim’s possession and 358,000 won at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each statute of the M, N, and F Statements;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. From among concurrent offenders, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] [the grounds for sentencing under Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act] and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall be sentenced in light of the following: (a) the basic area (6 to 1 year and 6 months) of the theft of general property; (b) there is no person [the decision of sentencing]; (c) there is a lot of criminal records for the defendant; (d) there are many kinds of criminal records for the defendant; and (e)

However, the fact that the error is being cited shall be considered as favorable circumstances, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all kinds of sentencing conditions.