1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited this case, is as follows: (a) the Defendant’s “Defendant” in the column No. 3 in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as “C”; and (b) the Plaintiff in the last part of the column No. 4 shall be deemed as “the Intervenor”; and (c) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the text of

[The plaintiff is basically repeating the same argument in the first instance trial. The plaintiff's statement in the evidence of No. 34 through No. 47 (including paper numbers) and the testimony of J of the party witness at the first instance trial, even if the plaintiff's new statement in the evidence of No. 34 through No. 47 (including paper numbers) are examined, the first instance judgment is justified).

2. In conclusion, the part of the claim for revocation of the approval of this case in the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and dismissed, and the remaining claim of the plaintiff is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.