logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.15 2014나2030054
해고무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff repeats the same argument in the first instance trial, which states, “The dismissal disposition in this case has a serious procedural defect, there is no reason to believe that there is no sexual harassment against the victimized student, and it is null and void as it abused the discretionary power of disciplinary action,” and even if considering the allegations and reasons partially supplemented by the Plaintiff, the first instance court’s decision is justifiable). 2. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim in this case is legitimate, and thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal in this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.

arrow